Contributors

About the Authors

  • The Authors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys who hold doctorates in a diverse array of biotech and chemical disciplines.

Contact the Docs

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter. When a new article is posted during the day, you will receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

« OREXIGEN Therapeutics Secures Allowance for Application Covering Zonisamide | Main | As It Turns Out, It Doesn't Have to Be a Rose to Smell as Sweet »

February 24, 2008

Court Report

    By Sherri Oslick --

Gavel_2About Court Report:  Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases, and a few interesting cases will be selected for periodic monitoring.


Galderma Laboratories, LP et al. v. Actavis Mid-Atlantic, L.L.C.

4:08-cv-00115; filed February 21, 2008 in the Northern District of Texas

Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,316,810 ("Foaming Composition for Washing and Treating Hair and/or Scalp Based on an Active Principle," issued January 8, 2000) following a paragraph IV certification as part of Actavis' filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Galderma's Clobex® Shampoo (clobetasol propionate shampoo, used to treat psoriasis).  View the complaint here.


Sepracor Inc. et al. v. Geopharma, Inc. et al.

3:08-cv-00945; filed February 20, 2008 in the District Court of New Jersey

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,214,683 ("Compositions of Descarboethoxyloratadine," issued May 8, 2007) and 7,214,684 ("Methods for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis," issued May 8, 2007), licensed to Schering-Plough, following a paragraph IV certification as part of Sandoz's filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Schering-Plough's Clarinex® (desloratidine, used to treat allergies).  View the complaint here.


Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. v. Wyeth et al.

2:08-cv-00067; filed February 15, 2008 in the Eastern District of Texas

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,060,447 ("Protein Complexes Having Factor VIII:C Activity and Production Thereof," issued May 9, 2000) and 6,228,620 (same title, issued May 8, 2001) based on Wyeth's manufacture and sale of its ReFacto® (recombinant antihemophilic Factor VIII, used to treat hemophilia).  View the complaint here.


Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. et al. v. Bayer Healthcare, LLC et al.

2:08-cv-00068; filed February 15, 2008 in the Eastern District of Texas

Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,138,505 ("Factor VIII:C Nucleic Acid Molecules," issued November 21, 2006) based on defendants' manufacture and sale of their Kogenate® (Bayer) and Helixate® (CSL Behring) (recombinant antihemophilic Factor VIII, used to treat hemophilia).  View the complaint here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1117334/26473386

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Court Report:

Comments

Post a comment

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Google Search