Contributors

About the Authors

  • The Authors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys who hold doctorates in a diverse array of biotech and chemical disciplines.

Contact the Docs

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter. When a new article is posted during the day, you will receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

« Conference & CLE Calendar | Main | Pharmaceutical Res., Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2007) »

November 04, 2007

Court Report

    By Sherri Oslick --

Gavel_2About Court Report:  Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases, and a few interesting cases will be selected for periodic monitoring.


Celgene Corporation et al. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al.

2:07-cv-05256; filed October 31, 2007 in the District Court of New Jersey

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,837,284 ("Delivery of Multiple Doses of Medications," issued November 17, 1998) and 6,635,284 (same title, issued October 21, 2003) (both assigned to Celgene and licensed exclusively to Novartis in certain fields of use) following a paragraph IV certification as part of Barr's filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Novartis' Ritalin® LA (methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release capsules, used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder/attention deficit disorder).  View the complaint here.


Elan Corporation PLC et al. v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC

1:07-cv-00679; filed October 29, 2007 in the District Court of Delaware

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,228,398 ("Multiparticulate Modified Release Composition," issued May 8, 2001) and 6,730,325 (same title, issued May 4, 2004), licensed to Novartis, following a paragraph IV certification as part of Actavis' filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Novartis' Focalin® XR (extended release dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride, used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder).  View the complaint here.


Medeva Pharma Suisse A.G. et al. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc.

3:07-cv-05165; filed October 26, 2007 in the District Court of New Jersey

Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,541,170 ("Orally Administrable Pharmaceutical Compositions," issued July 30, 1996) following a paragraph IV certification as part of Roxane's filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of plaintiffs' Asacol® (mesalamine, used to treatment ulcerative colitis).  View the complaint here.


Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al.

2:07-cv-05180; filed October 26, 2007 in the District Court of New Jersey

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,399,632 ("Method of Providing an Antihistaminic Effect in a Hepatically Impaired Patient," issued June 4, 2002), 6,187,791 (same title, issued February 13, 2001), and 6,037,353 (same title, issued March 14, 2000), 6,113,942 ("Pharmaceutical Composition for Piperidinoalkanol Compounds," issued September 5, 2000), 5,855,912 (same title, issued January 5, 1999), and 5,738,872 (same title, issued April 14, 1998) following a paragraph IV certification as part of Dr. Reddy's filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Aventis' Allegra-D® 24 Hour (fexofenadine hydrochloride/ pseudoephedrine, used to treat allergies).  View the complaint here.


Sepracor Inc. et al. v. Perrigo Research And Development Company et al.

3:07-cv-05136; filed October 25, 2007 in the District Court of New Jersey

Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,214,683 ("Compositions of Descarboethoxyloratadine," issued May 8, 2007) and 7,214,684 ("Methods for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis," issued May 8, 2007), licensed to Schering-Plough, following a paragraph IV certification as part of Perrigo's filing of an ANDA to manufacture a generic version of Schering-Plough's Clarinex® (desloratidine, used to treat allergies).  View the complaint here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1117334/23047812

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Court Report:

Comments

Post a comment

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Google Search